Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy did the best he could, but there’s just no way to win — or even compromise — with American leadership this far afield from reasonable adult behavior. A day before the world watched Donald Trump and JD Vance ambush Zelenskyy in the Oval Office, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer had to negotiate the same environment — albeit one less fraught as the political and culture war hell that Zelenskyy walked into.
Whether you’re Zelenskyy, or Starmer, or a Democratic or Republican member of Congress, the problem with negotiating with Trump is that it’s like negotiating with a terrorist. There can be no compromise with people whose only goal is to break things, and that’s exactly what Trump, Vance and congressional Republicans are doing. They have no plan other than to break the government, then divide the pieces amongst themselves, and allow the rest of us to fight for whatever is left.
It’s an odd plan because it potentially reflects a complete lack of a sense of self-preservation. If Trump and his government-breaking toady, Elon Musk, succeed in dismantling Social Security as it appears they’re trying to do, it could result in older Americans — largely Republican voters —revolting against their elected officials. I think you’re starting to see that in the form of voters at town hall events in Republican districts speaking out against congressional Republicans.
But the terrorists among us like Trump, Vance and their army of actual insurrectionists and far-right base don’t care about any of the negative consequences that could harm Americans if Musk’s breaking of the social safety net is effective. They just want to break, punish and inflict pain on anyone and everything they perceive as an enemy. In this way, they’re really are true belivers. They’re willing to sacrifice themselves for a higher cause. This makes them impossible to negotiate with, because they have nothing to fear.
Still, we must try. This seemingly impossible scenario of having to negotiate with a madman is the position that Starmer was in when he walked into the White House just a few days ago. So, I wanted to get the British perspective on his visit from Daniel Bates, a British writer and journalist based in New York who has covered some of the biggest stories of the last decade. I met Dan in Ferguson a few days after Michael Brown was killed there in August 2014, and we’ve kept in touch ever since.
These days, Dan spends a lot of time updating UK readers o court battles and other developments related to Jeffrey Epstein.
I caught up with Dan about Starmer’s visit, what American abdication of responsibility in Ukraine means for Britain and Europe, and the latest debacle involving the White House, right-wing influencers, and documents tied to the Epstein case.
***
Please follow AD on our social media for a little more doom to your scroll. That’s what we all need, right?
Bluesky - @americandoom.bsky.social
TikTok - @americandoom_
YouTube - @americandoom_
Instagram - @americandoom_
X - @americandoom_
Share this post